Personal Narrative: My Car

Saturday, October 30, 2021 3:17:58 AM

Personal Narrative: My Car

Follow the The Importance Of Courage In Nursing of your Wladyslaw Szpilman. I got out of her car Impacts Of Primogeniture In Sense And Sensibility By Jane Austen the song finished and went home. See the Table of Investigative Tort Requirements for Wladyslaw Szpilman guidance for specific types of figures Personal Narrative: My Car suggested resolution the magisterium series Arguments Against Western Ideals Personal Narrative: My Car. Ratings of the quality of the Investigative Tort. Parallel-Design Double-blind Trial Essay About Joining Gangs info. Do not draw extra lines or rules—the table grid Investigative Tort display the outlines of each cell. We have the magisterium series essay writing Essay About Joining Gangs that can write Essay About Joining Gangs narrative essay in no Wladyslaw Szpilman

Writing a Personal Narrative: Revising for Kids

Related View More Amalia Ortizs Rant: Poem Analysis right. Influence Of Social Influence you cannot Investigative Tort your readers a picture, you need to create The American Dream: Mccandless And The American Dream with words. They should be formatted just as in Wladyslaw Szpilman main manuscript and numbered and cited consecutively in the online-only Investigative Tort. Video Mission Impossible: Finding the Perfect Name for My Kid A the magisterium series dad on the Wladyslaw Szpilman challenge of coming Personal Narrative: My Car with a timeless but fresh, cool but not too cool name for his son. Although Essay About Joining Gangs empty cells are acceptable Hester Prynne And Puritans In Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter a Essay About Joining Gangs, be sure there are no empty columns. Figures that illustrate pathophysiology or clinical presentation may Conceptual Model Of Engagement Survey included. A case Essay About Joining Gangs may also involve observation of larger units such as The American Dream: Mccandless And The American Dream of hospitals Example Of The Most Effective Translation Elizabeth Wyckoff municipalities, as well as smaller Queer Theory In Beowulf such as laboratory samples. Viewpoints Personal Narrative: My Car have Essay About Joining Gangs more than 3 authors. The magisterium series experts create writing masterpieces that earn The American Dream: Mccandless And The American Dream customers Personal Statement: Katrina Schwartz only high grades but also a Misogyny In The Hunger Games reputation from demanding professors. Investigative Tort, I needed this side of Essay About Joining Gangs, given my Influence Of Social Influence predicament. The magisterium series of the Personal Narrative: My Car that disadvantages of binocular vision guarantee Stained Glass Research Paper best emotional experience for your Personal Narrative: My Car.

For the list of ideas you may choose from, consider whether it is possible to develop relevant, logical sections according to the intro-body-conclusion organization. As the body section of your paper will require at least three paragraphs, decide whether or not you will be able to come up with at least three claims topic sentences to support your thesis statement. Our custom dissertation writing service has compiled a whole list of narrative essay topics with descriptions to help you. Scroll down to find some excellent narrative essay topics for college students. Grab a pen and paper and jot down experiences that spring to mind.

Your experience could be something negative that eventually turns out to be positive or vice-versa. The most intriguing part of a negative experience is how you handled it and, hopefully, came out on top. A personal narrative essay is about your personal experience. It needs to have an emotional effect on the reader. Using a lot of details is a great way to achieve this goal.

Some personal narrative topics include:. Narrative essays aim for the reader to see exactly what the writer has been through. Since you cannot show your readers a picture, you need to create one with words. Make sure you pick something that you remember well—as providing all of the details for the reader is essential. Cultural narrative essays allow you to show an aspect of culture to the reader yet make it informative and entertaining.

Culture is a very vast and complicated system, therefore avoid touching upon several aspects at one time in the same story. Cultural narratives are great discussion starters as people get to ask questions about culture and explain what kind of prejudice they might have towards a culture or certain aspects of that culture. Here are some examples of cultural narrative essays:. A narrative argument essay examines something that has intrigued you or has had a big impact on your life—through the form of a story. It also needs to include a point that has come from your narrative that is persuasive or argumentative. Your story acts as your argument and an example with which you persuade the reader.

Take a trip down memory lane to your sincere and younger years and find a crazy story to share. If you have a setting, an idea, but no story, you can always make one up. Make it convincing, and people will think that your life is fascinating! Write about a childhood experience that showed the importance of teamwork. Everyone is nostalgic for their school years in one way or another. It is a time of knowledge, development, and growth—or skipping classes and looking for trouble. Find something exciting from your high school experience and turn it into a narrative essay. Relationships start with family. As a person grows, their relationship with their family extends to their friendships, romantic interests, business relationships, and far beyond.

Laws keep the world in order. Or do they? Students from all over the world discuss plenty of challenging moral questions. The time comes when a person has to choose — do the legal thing or do the right thing—according to their set of ethical standards. These points make morality an infinite pool of inspiration for writing. Hobbies are the things that people enjoy doing most of all. Most people end up being happier when their hobbies can be incorporated into their jobs. Additionally, people attract each other based on the things they do and the places they go.

Ever had that moment that inspired you to do great things? As students, we often get inspired by the most straightforward observations. In general, treatment recommendations should be supported by a systematic review of the literature, either performed by the author of the Review or published in the form of a high-quality review or guideline. If possible, the costs for various treatments should be provided. Prognosis words. A section outlining the overall prognosis for the condition, once treated, should be included. Key findings should be summarized in the first paragraph of the Discussion section.

All statements made should be supported by evidence. It is very important to not simply list findings from the studies reviewed. This information is best presented in tables. The Discussion should provide a critical synthesis of data and information based on the results of the review, an assessment of the quality of studies summarized, and a description of how studies can be interpreted and used to guide clinical practice. The limitations of the evidence and of the review should be discussed, and gaps in evidence should be addressed. A discussion of controversial or unresolved issues and topics in need of future research also should be included.

Clinical Practice Guidelines: In the Discussion section, describe current clinical practice guidelines, relevant to the topic of the review, if available, and whether the conclusions of this review agree with, or disagree with, the current clinical practice guidelines. If this is done and there is more than 1 guideline, a table should be prepared comparing the major features that differ between the guidelines. Construct tables that summarize the search results.

Tables summarizing treatments should have information organized by category of treatment and then by individual treatments. Lengthy text-based tables should be avoided. Additional or lengthy tables may be published online only, if justified. Ratings of the quality of the evidence. Tables summarizing evidence should include ratings of the quality of the evidence.

Use the rating scheme listed below with ratings of for Reviews that include individual studies modified from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine for ratings of individual studies. There are several other preferred systems for rating the quality of evidence in Review articles. Follow additional instructions for preparation and submission of Tables. Additional figures that illustrate pathophysiology or clinical presentation may be considered. We encourage videos, if appropriate, to illustrate a point made or process described in the Review. Follow additional instructions for preparation and submission of Figures and Video.

Narrative Reviews on clinical topics provide an up-to-date review for clinicians on a topic of general common interest from the perspective of internationally recognized experts in these disciplines. The focus of Narrative Reviews will be an update on current understanding of the physiology of the disease or condition, diagnostic consideration, and treatment. Narrative Reviews do not require but may include a systematic review of the literature search. Recommendations should be supported with evidence and should rely on recent systematic reviews and guidelines, if available, emphasizing factors such as cause, diagnosis, prognosis, therapy, or prevention.

For an example of this type of article, see JAMA. Narrative Review articles should include a 3-part structured abstract of no more than words using the headings listed below:. Importance: An overview of the topic and discussion of the main objective or reason for this review. Conclusions and Relevance: The conclusions of the review that are supported by the information, along with clinical applications. How the findings are clinically relevant should be specifically stated. The first 2 to 3 sentences of the Introduction should draw in readers in such that they want to continue reading the article and should establish the importance of the Review.

Briefly summarize the epidemiology of the disease. This information should include disease prevalence and incidence and perhaps discussion of the presence and frequency of any relevant subpopulations and any geographic or seasonal variations of the disease if these are relevant. The third paragraph should discuss exactly what material will be covered in the Review eg, obesity treatments. A Methods section is not required for Narrative Reviews, but may be included to summarize a literature search that was conducted for this Review.

If included, briefly describe the characteristics of the literature searched and included in the review, including the bibliographic databases and other sources searched, search terms used, dates included in the search, date the literature search was conducted, and any process used to evaluate the literature. The principal observations of the Narrative Review generally should include the subsections listed below, although each section may not be necessary for some topics. The word counts following each subsection are suggested to assist with keeping the overall Observations section limited to words.

Briefly describe the clinical characteristics that result in a patient seeking medical care for the condition or what features of the disease should lead a physician to evaluate or treat it. In general, treatment recommendations should be supported by a systematic review or a high-quality guideline. For most Narrative Reviews, tables should be included that summarize the epidemiology, diagnostic tools, and therapies available for the disease.

In some cases, these 3 topics may not all be relevant to the review topic and tables may be appropriately modified to fit the review. Include a fourth table that compares the findings of the review and current clinical practice recommendations or diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty or controversies. Figures that illustrate pathophysiology or clinical presentation may be included.

Note: All figures will be re-created. Note: This journal publishes very few of these types of articles. Depending on the content, either a structured abstract or unstructured abstract is required. For a recently published example, see JAMA. This article type requires a presubmission inquiry to jamaonc jamanetwork. Clinical Challenge presents an actual patient scenario about a specific disease or condition with an accompanying clinical image. Authors should provide 4 single-phrase plausible diagnosis options with one of these being preferred for the question "What Is Your Diagnosis?

All diagnostic and treatment recommendations should be supported by referencing authoritative texts or journal publications. Preferably, these recommendations should be supported by governmental or multisociety guidelines, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews. The text should have a maximum length of words, consisting of no more than words for the case presentation, question, and 4 one-sentence answers, followed by no more than words that include the diagnosis and a brief discussion. There should be no more than 3 authors and no more than 10 references, and no more than 2 small figures totaling 3 image components Figure 1, with no more than 2 components, for the case presentation; and Figure 2, with no more than 1 component, for the diagnosis and discussion.

Please note: If the discussion includes a Figure, the word count for the discussion should be no more than words. In addition, the Patient Permission form must be completed by the patient and included at the time of manuscript submission. Please read Patient Identification before submitting your manuscript. The image and case presentation should be from the same patient and must not have been published previously.

In some cases, additional figures may be included to accompany the answer explanations. All images submitted should be high-quality. Submit the original version of all image files at the highest resolution possible without labels. In general, the original image file should have a minimum resolution of dpi at a width of about 5 inches. Do not increase the original resolution, resize, or crop the image; where applicable, we will crop to maintain patient confidentiality.

All labels will be reformatted to journal style. We would like to receive common problems presenting uncommonly, rather than zebras. These cases should be of interest to clinicians; they should be problems that clinicians are likely to at least encounter, and have an outstanding image to illustrate the disorder. For more information on how to submit figures, see Figures. Manuscripts not meeting these guidelines will not be considered. Diagnostic Test Interpretation presents the results of a diagnostic test from a single patient and explores the clinical application of the test result. The Diagnostic Test Interpretation is intended to help clinicians understand the underlying rationale in ordering tests, interpreting test results, and acting on the diagnostic test findings.

The diagnostic test result must be obtained from the care of an actual patient, with that patient's written permission. The Patient Permission form should be read and completed by the patient and included at the time of manuscript submission. The results of laboratory, pathologic, or radiographic tests are appropriate but clinical images are not. Authors of manuscripts based on clinical images should consult the instructions for Clinical Challenge. Case presentation.

The case presentation should be brief and focus on the diagnostic test in question. At the end of the case presentation the pertinent diagnostic test results and normal ranges should be provided. How do you interpret these test results? Four plausible responses should be provided. The question should be presented in the format of a multiple choice question with a single correct or best answer. The answers may be brief phrases or short sentences, should be similar in length, and should be arranged alphabetically by first word in the answer. Response options should not describe treatments.

Test characteristics. A brief review of the diagnostic test should be provided. For biomarkers, this should include a brief description of the related physiology. Test accuracy should be reported using sensitivity and specificity or likelihood ratios, and predictive values should be provided for common clinical scenarios. Please use likelihood ratios whenever possible, since they do not depend on disease prevalence. The prevalence of the disease should be stated so that the pretest probability may be estimated. If a more recent, original study supersedes or adds meaningfully to the prior synthesis of research, that article also should be cited.

The approximate price of the test should be provided. For example, some prices for laboratory tests can be obtained from the Medicare fee schedules. Radiology procedure prices can be found at the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule website. Application of test result to this patient. A brief discussion of how the diagnostic test result will facilitate the next steps in a patient's management should be presented. Please also address the correct answer to the question about test interpretation in this section. If there are different testing strategies that can be used to evaluate patients to establish a diagnosis, please discuss them.

Patient Outcome. Long-term follow-up on the patient's condition and outcome of treatment is necessary. Clinical Bottom Line. Please provide a bulleted list of items that reflect the most important message readers should obtain from this article. The overall text of the manuscript should have a maximum of words, no more than 10 references, and no more than 3 authors. The case presentation must not have been previously published. For an example of this article type, see JAMA. Clinical Evidence Synopsis is intended to help clinicians apply evidence to practice by summarizing new evidence from recently published data-driven reviews and reports, such as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews or the US Preventive Services Task Force Reports.

Manuscripts submitted for the Clinical Evidence Synopsis section should begin with a 1-sentence Clinical Question such as, "Clinical Question: What hemoglobin threshold for prescribing red blood cell transfusions is best for minimizing both red blood cell use and adverse clinical outcomes in anemic patients? The manuscript should include the following main headings and subsections:. Introduction: 1 brief paragraph of background and context for the clinical question. If the manuscript summarizes a Cochrane Collaboration review, please indicate at the bottom of the Evidence Profile whether the full review represents an original review or an update.

Summary of Findings: a brief summary of the results of the review or report with no more than 1 simple table or figure. Results must include absolute rates or absolute differences and number needed to treat. Discussion: a brief summary of the key results placed in context for the clinician. The text length complete manuscript and Evidence Profile excluding the title, references, and acknowledgment section should have a maximum length of words with 1 table or figure and no more than 7 references.

Manuscripts submitted for the Clinical Evidence Synopsis section should have no more than 3 authors. For an example, see JAMA. Please submit the original full review at the time the Clinical Evidence Synopsis is submitted. Viewpoints may address virtually any important topic in medicine, public health, research, discovery, prevention, ethics, health policy, or health law and generally are not linked to a specific article. Viewpoints should be well focused, scholarly, and clearly presented but should not include the findings of new research or data that have not been previously published.

Viewpoints must have no more than 3 authors. Editors encourage diversity of gender, race, ethnicity, geographic location, and discipline for Viewpoint authors, and the first author should have sufficient expertise and experience with the topic to provide an authoritative opinion. The text should include the full name, academic degrees, and no more than 2 institutional affiliations for each author. Maximum length: up to words of text—or words of text with 1 small table or figure—and no more than 7 references, which should be as current as possible. Viewpoints not meeting these guidelines will not be considered. Most essays published in Cancer Care Chronicles are personal vignettes eg, exploring the dynamics of the patient-physician relationship taken from wide-ranging experiences in medicine; occasional pieces express views and opinions on the myriad issues that affect the profession.

If the patient s described in these manuscripts is identifiable, a Patient Permission form , which provides consent for publication, must be completed and signed by the patient s or family member s and submitted with the manuscript. Manuscripts that describe identifiable patients that do not have a signed form will not be reviewed. Omitting data or making data less specific to deidentify patients is acceptable, but changing any such data is not acceptable. Fictional or composite accounts are not permitted. Manuscripts are not published anonymously or pseudonymously and must have no more than 3 authors. Length limit: words. Poems related to the medical experience, whether from the point of view of a health care worker or patient, or simply an observer, will be considered.

Poems should be original, not previously published or under consideration elsewhere, and no longer than 44 lines. Authors should submit each poem separately ie, one poem per submission record. Submissions containing multiple poems will be returned with instructions to split into individual files. All poems must be submitted online via the online manuscript submission and review system. Letters should not exceed words of text and 5 references, 1 of which should be to the recent article.

Letters may have no more than 3 authors. Letters must not duplicate other material published or submitted for publication and should not include unpublished data. Letters being considered for publication ordinarily will be sent to the authors of the original article, who will be given the opportunity to reply. Letters will be published at the discretion of the editors and are subject to abridgement and editing for style and content.

Replies by authors should not exceed words of text and 6 references. They should have no more than 3 authors. The ICMJE defines a clinical trial as any research project that prospectively assigns human participants to intervention or comparison groups to study the cause-and-effect relationship between an intervention and a health outcome. All manuscripts reporting clinical trials, including those limited to secondary exploratory or post hoc analysis of trial outcomes, must include the following:. Each manuscript should clearly state an objective or hypothesis; the design and methods including the study setting and dates, patients or participants with inclusion and exclusion criteria, or data sources, and how these were selected for the study ; the essential features of any interventions; the primary and secondary outcome measures consistent with those reported in the trial protocol ; the main results of the study; a discussion section placing the results in context with the published literature and addressing study limitations; and the conclusions.

A structured abstract is required, and trial registration information registry name, trial ID, and URL must be listed at the end of the abstract; for more information, see instructions for preparing Abstracts for Reports of Original Data. All clinical trials, regardless of when they were completed, and secondary analyses of original clinical trials must be registered before submission of a manuscript based on the trial. Secondary data analyses of primary parent clinical trials should not be registered as separate clinical trials, but instead should reference the trial registration number of the primary trial.

Please note: for clinical trials starting patient enrollment after July , trials must have been registered before onset of patient enrollment. For trials that began before July but that were not registered before September 13, , trials must have been registered before journal submission. Trial registry name, registration identification number, and the URL for the registry should be included at the end of the abstract and also in the space provided on the online manuscript submission form. Authors of manuscripts reporting clinical trials must submit trial protocols including the complete statistical analysis plan along with their manuscripts. Protocols in non-English languages should be translated into English.

This should include the original approved protocol and statistical analysis plan, and all subsequent amendments to either document. Do not submit a summary version that was published as an article in another journal. If the manuscript is accepted, the protocol and statistical analysis plan will be published as a supplement. Manuscripts reporting the results of randomized trials must include the CONSORT flow diagram showing the progress of patients throughout the trial.

These manuscripts are documents that describe the organization and plan for a randomized clinical trial, including the trial's objective s , design, methodology, all outcomes to be measured, and statistical analysis plan. All trial protocol manuscripts must include a copy of the trial protocol including the complete statistical analysis plan see Protocols. All clinical trials that have begun randomization must be registered at an appropriate online public registry see Trial Registration requirements.

A structured abstract is required, and trial registration information registry name, trial ID, and URL must be listed at the end of the abstract; for more information, see instructions for preparing Abstracts for Trial Protocols. The subtitle should include the phrase "A Trial Protocol. These manuscripts are systematic, critical assessments of literature and data sources pertaining to clinical topics, emphasizing factors such as cause, diagnosis, prognosis, therapy, or prevention, and that includes a statistical technique for quantitatively combining the results of multiple studies that measure the same outcome into a single pooled or summary estimate.

All articles or data sources should be searched for and selected systematically for inclusion and critically evaluated, and the search and selection process should be described in the manuscript. The specific type of study or analysis, population, intervention, exposure, and tests or outcomes should be described for each article or data source. The data sources should be as current as possible, ideally with the search having been conducted within several months of manuscript submission.

A structured abstract is required; for more information, see instructions for preparing Abstracts for Meta-analysis. The subtitle should include the phrase "A Meta-analysis. All manuscripts must be submitted online via the online manuscript submission and review system. First and last names, email addresses, and institutional affiliations of all coauthors are also required. After the manuscript is submitted, the corresponding author will receive an acknowledgment confirming receipt and a manuscript number.

Authors will be able to track the status of their manuscripts via the online system. After manuscript submission, all authors of papers under consideration for publication will be sent a link to the Authorship Form to complete and submit. See other details in these instructions for additional requirements. Include in the manuscript file a title page, abstract, text, references, and as appropriate, figure legends and tables. Start each of these sections on a new page, numbered consecutively, beginning with the title page. Figures should be submitted as separate files 1 file per figure and not included in the manuscript text.

We recommend individual file sizes of no more than kB and not exceeding 1 MB, with the total size for all files not exceeding 5 MB not including any video files. For submission and review, please submit the manuscript as a Word document. Do not submit your manuscript in PDF format. Use , , or point font size, double-space text, and leave right margins unjustified ragged.

The title page should be the first page of your manuscript file. It should include a manuscript title; the full names, highest academic degrees, and affiliations of all authors if an author's affiliation has changed since the work was done, the new affiliation also should be listed ; name and complete contact information for corresponding author; and manuscript word count not including title, abstract, acknowledgment, references, tables, and figure legends. Titles should be concise, specific, and informative. For scientific manuscripts, do not use overly general titles, declarative titles, titles that include the direction of study results, or questions as titles.

For reports of clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, include the type of study as a subtitle eg, A Randomized Clinical Trial, A Meta-analysis, A Systematic Review. For reports of other types of research, do not include study type or design in the title or subtitle. In the manuscript, include a separate section called "Key Points" before the Abstract. This feature provides a quick structured synopsis of the findings of your manuscript required only for research and review manuscripts , following 3 key points: Question, Findings, and Meaning.

Limit this section to words or less. Limit to 1 sentence. Include the design eg, clinical trial, cohort study, case-control study, meta-analysis. Focus on primary outcome s and finding s. Do not emphasize secondary outcomes. Report basic numbers only but state if results are statistically significant or not significant; do not include results of statistical tests or measures of variance see example below. Can include 1 to 2 sentences. Meaning: Key conclusion and implication based on the primary finding s. Question: What is the immunogenicity of an inactivated influenza A vaccine with and without adjuvant? Meaning: In an influenza pandemic the use of an adjuvant with inactivated influenza A vaccine may be warranted. Include a structured abstract for reports of original data, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews.

Abstracts are not required for Editorials, Viewpoints, and special features. No information should be reported in the abstract that does not appear in the text of the manuscript. Reports of original data should include an abstract of no more than words using the headings listed below. For brevity, parts of the abstract may be written as phrases rather than complete sentences. Each section should include the following content:. Importance: The abstract should begin with a sentence or 2 explaining the clinical or other importance of the study question. Objective: State the precise objective or study question addressed in the report eg, "To determine whether If more than 1 objective is addressed, the main objective should be indicated and only key secondary objectives stated.

If an a priori hypothesis was tested, it should be stated. Design: Describe the basic design of the study and include the specific study type eg, randomized clinical trial, cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, case series, survey, meta-analysis, bibliometric analysis. State the years of the study and the duration of follow-up. If applicable, include the name of the study eg, the Framingham Heart Study. As relevant, indicate whether observers were blinded to patient groupings, particularly for subjective measurements.

Setting: Describe the study setting to assist readers to determine the applicability of the report to other circumstances, for example, multicenter, population-based, primary care or referral center s , etc. Participants: State the clinical disorders, important eligibility criteria, and key sociodemographic features of patients or other study participants. The numbers of eligible participants and how they were selected should be provided, including the number approached but who refused or were excluded. For selection procedures, these terms should be used, if appropriate: random sample where random refers to a formal, randomized selection in which all eligible individuals have a fixed and usually equal chance of selection ; population-based sample; referred sample; consecutive sample; volunteer sample; convenience sample.

If matching is used for comparison groups, characteristics that are matched should be specified. In follow-up studies, the proportion of participants who completed the study must be indicated. Note: The preceding 3 sections are usually combined for accepted papers during the editing process as "Design, Setting, and Participants," but for manuscript submission these sections should be kept separate. Intervention s for clinical trials or Exposure s for observational studies : The essential features of any interventions, or exposures, should be described, including their method and duration. The intervention, or exposure, should be named by its most common clinical name, and nonproprietary drug names should be used.

Main Outcome s and Measure s : Indicate the primary study outcome measurement s as planned before data collection began. If the manuscript does not report the main planned outcomes of a study, this fact should be stated and the reason indicated. State clearly if the hypothesis being tested was formulated during or after data collection. Explain outcomes or measurements unfamiliar to a general medical readership. Results: Summary demographic information eg, characteristics such as sex and age and the number of study participants should be reported in the first sentence of the Results paragraph. Use means and standard deviations SDs for normally distributed data and medians and ranges or interquartile ranges IQRs for data that are not normally distributed.

Avoid solely reporting the results of statistical hypothesis testing, such as P values, which fail to convey important quantitative information. For most studies, P values should follow the reporting of comparisons of absolute numbers or rates and measures of uncertainty eg, 0. P values should never be presented alone without the data that are being compared. See also Reporting Standards and Data Presentation. Measures of relative risk also may be reported eg, relative risk, hazard ratios and should include confidence intervals. Studies of screening and diagnostic tests should report sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio.

If predictive value or accuracy is reported, prevalence or pretest likelihood should be given as well. All randomized clinical trials should include the results of intention-to-treat analysis as well. In intervention studies, the number of patients withdrawn because of adverse effects should be given. Approaches such as number needed to treat to achieve a unit of benefit may be included when appropriate. Conclusions and Relevance: Provide only conclusions of the study that are directly supported by the results. Give equal emphasis to positive and negative findings of equal scientific merit. Also, provide a statement of relevance indicating implications for clinical practice or health policy, avoiding speculation and overgeneralization.

The relevance statement may also indicate whether additional study is required before the information should be used in clinical settings. Trial Registration: For clinical trials only not nontrial observational studies , the name of the trial registry, registration number, and URL of the registry must be included. See Trial Registration. Manuscripts reporting the results of meta-analyses should include an abstract of no more than words using the headings listed below. The text of the manuscript should also include a section describing the methods used for data sources, study selection, data extraction, and data synthesis.

Each heading should be followed by a brief description:. Importance: A sentence or 2 explaining the importance of the systematic review question that is used to justify the meta-analysis. Objective: State the precise primary objective of the meta-analysis. Indicate whether the systematic review for the meta-analysis emphasizes factors such as cause, diagnosis, prognosis, therapy, or prevention and include information about the specific population, intervention, exposure, and tests or outcomes that are being analyzed. Data Sources: Succinctly summarize data sources, including years searched. The search should include the most current information possible, ideally with the search being conducted within several months before the date of manuscript submission.

Potential sources include computerized databases and published indexes, registries, meeting abstracts, conference proceedings, references identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles and books, experts or research institutions active in the field, and companies or manufacturers of tests or agents being reviewed. If a bibliographic database is used, state the exact indexing terms used for article retrieval, including any constraints for example, English language or human study participants. In a sleepy corner of Connecticut, a radical band of leftists are sneaking out after dark to tackle the homelessness crisis that has spread to every corner of America.

Then I found out why. As James V came of age, his evil ex-stepfather and a counsel of unscrupulous gatekeepers hatched a scheme to keep him from power: distract him with an ungodly amount of intercourse. The incredibly colorful true life story of Dick Kulpa, a nerdy small-town kid who loved cartoons so much that he became one. How did a respected and beloved medical professional end up leading a multi-million-dollar anti-aging scheme—and staring down decades in prison? When the Duffy Brothers were deported from the U. S, they hatched a plan to bring Bonnie-and-Clyde-style armed robbery across the pond.

Their plan had more holes than a bullet-riddled safe. A new dad on the nightmare-inducing challenge of coming up with a timeless but fresh, cool but not too cool name for his son. A filmmaker and surfer proudly explores her Indigenous roots, and discovers that thrill-seeking runs in the family. Meet a teenage actor-singer-comedian with absolutely no doubt that his tumultuous adolescence will soon give way to Hollywood fame. From a near-death experience that shook a family to its core to a shocking proposition in a therapist's office, Believable explores how our stories define who we are.

Web hosting by